Announcing Engineering Enigmas
Engineering Enigmas is simplified Tarot reading for working engineers.
Any time you feel stuck and need help in finding a way forward, open that web page and follow the advice given. You may have to be creative in how you interpret the advice in order for it to apply to your situation – that’s intentional.
Don’t refresh the page until you get advice that suits you better. Take what you are given and roll with it.
… wait, what? But why??
Humans hate deciding things randomly but do it anyway
Humans generally like to be seen as either
- rational, analytical people capable of strategising our decisions down to the last detail; or
- in tune with our inner emotions and intition, capable of understanding exactly all nuances of how we feel about alternatives.
That’s what we tell ourselves, but we are never that analytical or intuitive. In its place, we have used randomness to decide things since time immemorial. When we do it, we do it in a way that allows us to hide that it has happened – even from ourselves. Here are three of the ways.
We have entire professions legitimising arbitrary decisions
Many of our decisions have no strong rationale either way:
- Which of these four alternatives should we try first to improve our profitability?
- Which cloud provider should we rely on for primary services?
- Which job offer should I accept?
- How much time should we spend on paying down technical debt?
A decision needs to be made, but among decent alternatives, we can’t really single out one clearly superior option. This means whatever we decide, it will ultimately be arbitrary.
Admitting to an arbitrary decision makes us look not-analytical or not-intuitive, so we look to others to validate our decision and lend it legitimacy. This is the reason we pay astrologers, witch-doctors, macroeconomists, and management consultants; they are all people that generate decisions with the rational capacity of a pair of dice, but we pertend they know what they are doing so their support turns an arbitrary decision into a legitimate one. Result: we are no worse off, but we sleep better at night.
These professions hide how clueless we are behind fancy words and speculative hypotheses. They serve a social function, rather than a technical one. The decision is just as arbitrary as before.
Randomness can improve decisions in adversarial situations
Some ancient human tribes1 I wish I remembered more details about this story and where I read it. It may not even be true. But it could have been. Consider the point I’m trying to convey rather than factual correctness. had a ritual where once a year, they heated a large animal bone until it cracked. The cracks became a map indicating where to go over the next hunting season. Their spoken rationale for this was that the cracking pattern was a message from the deities, indicating where hunting would be good. The actual reason it worked is far more mundane: by randomising their hunting patterns they made it harder for the prey to learn how to avoid them.
The same thing happens in rock-paper-scissors and poker. Randomising decisions in adversarial situations makes it harder for the opponent to exploit otherwise-systematic strategies.
Randomness can infuse creativity
Sometimes the astrologer (or management consultant, or heated bone) does not directly decide, but they inject enough randomness into the decision process to kick loose a few rocks and spark the creativity of the real decision-maker.2 Weinberg talks a lot about this in his Secrets of Consulting book series, where he calls it jiggling the system.
Embrace the randomness
Instead of fighting against the arbitrariness and randomness involved in making decisions, we can save a lot of time and effort by realising it is there, and using it more actively. If I find it hard to decide something (e.g. between strawberry or vanilla ice cream) I glance down at my watch, and thanks to chronostasis3 The neuro-optical phenomenon where when you first look at a clock, the second hand appears to stand still for longer than usual before getting moving again. it is trivial to see whether I did so when the second hand pointed at an even or odd number. If it was even, I go with the first choice, otherwise the second.
I use this method to decide on things more than I would want to admit because when the people around me realise that’s what happened, they sigh and treat the decision as invalid and get re-stuck trying to decide again.
The reason it makes sense to embrace randomness is that however rational we are, we can never strategise down to the last detail. Chance and unknown factors play such a large part in determining the outcome that at some point, it’s better to stop strategising and just decide. Anything is better than nothing, and doing something will give us more information. This information is helpful for adjusting or making similar decisions in the future.
Tarot for engineering
This is what Engineering Enigmas helps us do. A while back I read Xe Iaso’s Tarot for Hackers article, where she proposes drawing Tarot cards to help understand software systems. What I dislike about that approach is that it requires some familiarity with Tarot cards and their meaning, as well as how that meaning changes depending on location in the spread. We don’t have time for that! We just want to be kicked loose.
What we want is something closer to Eno and Schmidt’s Obliuqe Strategies. Inspired by that, I authored vague and widely applicable advice based on the meaning of each Tarot card. That’s what the tool shows you.
Anticipated and Asked Questions
Not that I expect many questions, but if they arrive I will try to answer them here.
Why do I get the same advice when I refresh?
The advice only changes every ten minutes.
Why the old pictures?
There have been some attempts at this type of tool previously, aimed at product development or navigating organisational politics. Many of them try to reinvent the actual cards both with artwork and switching to more modern interpretations. Common to them all is that they didn’t – at least in my opinion – actually end up very good.
One of the strengths of these old Tarot cards is that they are so broadly interpretable and adaptable. Capturing that in a more modern set would take a lot of time and effort, which would at best be incidental to the purpose of the tool. Thus, the most efficient way forward has been to lean into the Rider–Waite card designs, as they are known.
If you are confident in your abilities to generate a fresh set of cohesive graphics with wide interpretability and you want to contribute to this, I would be more than happy to hear about it!